Temporal Distance and Message Concreteness in Facebook Ads: The Moderating Effects of Social Distance.

Fei Xue, Lijie Zhou

Abstract


The study examined the effects of social distance, temporal distance, and message concreteness on Facebook users’ response to News Feed advertising. A 2 (social distance: low vs. high) × 2 (temporal distance: near future vs. distant future) × 2 (message: abstract vs. concrete) between-group design was utilized to explore the main and interaction effects of three factors on Facebook users’ attitude-toward-the-ad, brand interest, and purchase intention. Results suggested that social distance via Facebook moderated the congruency between temporal distance and message concreteness. When the ads were affiliated with close friends, effects predicted by the Construal Level Theory (CLT) were found. The findings indicate the importance of social distance when examining temporal distance and message concreteness in a social media setting. Social media marketers should consider the strength of social relationships based on time of the event and advertising message formats. Future research could examine other products and services and utilize different research methods, such as eye-tracking or field studies. The study tested CLT in a social media setting, particularly the role of relationship strength among Facebook users. It adds theoretical value to existing CLT research and provides valuable insights for social media marketers.

 

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.54663/2182-9306.2024.v.12.n.22.33-53


Keywords


Facebook advertising; social distance; temporal distance; message concreteness; Construal Level Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akar, E., Yüksel, H. and Bulut, Z. (2015), The impact of social influence on the decision-making process of sports consumers on Facebook. Journal of Internet Applications and Management, 6(2), 5-27.

Bausenhart, K. M., Ulrich, R., & Kaup, B. (2023). Association between abstraction level and time: Are future and past more abstract than the present? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231217732

Bakshy, E., Eckles, D., Yan, R., & Rosenn, I. (2012). Social influence in social advertising: Evidence from field experiments. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 146-161.

Berinsky, A., Huber, G., & Lenz, G. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351-368.

Bhati, A., & McDonnell, D. (2020). Success in an online giving day: The role of social media in fundraising. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(1), 74–92.

Boroditsky L. (2007). Comparison and the development of knowledge. Cognition, 102(1), 118-128.

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.

Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6 2156-2160.

Chatterjee, S. (2023). Effect of construal level on the drivers of online-review-helpfulness. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09716-2

Choi, Y. K., Seo, Y. & Yoon, S. (2017). E-WOM messaging on social media: Social ties, temporal distance, and message concreteness. Internet Research, 27(3), 495-505.

Clifford, S., Jewell, R., & Waggoner, P. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1-9.

Davis, M., Anthony, D., & Pauls, S. (2015). Seeking and receiving social support on Facebook for surgery. Social Science & Medicine, 131, 40-47.

de Groot, J. I. M. (2022). The Personalization paradox in Facebook advertising: The mediating effect of relevance on the personalization-brand attitude relationship and the moderating effect of intrusiveness. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 22(1), 57-74,

Dencheva, V. (2024). Facebook advertising and marketing - statistics & facts. Retrieved July 09, 2024, from: https://www.statista.com/topics/1559/facebook-marketing/#statisticChapter

Ding, C., Cheng, H., Duan, Y. & Jin, Y. (2017). The power of the “like” button: The impact of social media on box office. Decision Support Systems, 94, 77-84.

Facebook. (2023). When will my ad show with social information? Retrieved August 2, 2023, from https://www.facebook.com/business/help/1447178318880237

Flores, W., Chen, J. V. & Ross, W. H. (2014). The effect of variations in banner ad, type of product, website context, and language of advertising on Internet users’ attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 37-47.

Follmer, D. J., Sperling, R. A., & Suen, H. K. (2017). The role of MTurk in education research: Advantages, issues, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 329-334.

FUTURE DATA STATS (2024). Native Advertising Market Size, Share, Trends & Competitive Analysis. Retrieved July 09, 2024, from: https://www.futuredatastats.com/native-advertising-market

Huang, L., Tan, C., Ke, W., & Wei, K.K. (2018). Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(6). Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss6/3

Interactive Advertising Bureau (2015). IAB Deep Dive on In-Feed Ad Units. Retrieved July 15, 2023, from: https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/IAB_Deep_Dive_on_InFeed_Ad_Units.pdf

Jung, J., Shim, S. W., Jin, H. S., & Khang, H. (2016). Factors affecting attitudes and behavioural intention towards social networking advertising: A case of Facebook users in South Korea. International Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 248-265.

Kim, Y., Kang, M., Choi, S. & Sung, Y. (2016). To click or not to click? Investigating antecedents of advertisement clicking on Facebook. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 44, 657-668.

Kim, J., Kim, P. B., Kim, J.-E., & Magnini, V. P. (2016). Application of construal-level theory to promotional strategies in the hotel industry. Journal of Travel Research, 55(3), 340-352.

Kim, D., Sung, Y., Lee, S., Choi, D. & Sung, Y. (2016). Are you on Timeline or News Feed? The roles of Facebook pages and construal level in increasing ad effectiveness. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 312-320.

Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343-356.

Lee, D., Hosanagar, K. & Nair, H. (2018). Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Science, 64(11), 5105-5131.

Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca. F. (2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 43-57.

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201-1205.

Luan, J., Filieri, R., Xiao, J., & Sun, Y. (2023). Consumer–brand relationships and social distance: A construal level theory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 40, 1299-1315.

Machleit, K. A., Madden, T. J., & Allen, C. T. (1990). Measuring and modeling brand interest as an alternative Aad effect with familiar brands. Advances in Consumer Research,17, 223-230.

MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130-143.

Matthews, J. L., & Matlock, T. (2011). Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Social Psychology, 42(3), 185–192.

McSpadden, K. (2015, May 14). You Now Have a Shorter Attention Span Than a Goldfish. Time. https://time.com/3858309/attention-spans-goldfish/

Meta Ads (2024). The ad auction explained. Retrieved July, 09. 2024, from: https://www.facebook.com/business/ads/ad-auction

Meta Ads (2024). Your customers are here. Find them with Meta ads. Retrieved July, 09. 2024, from: https://www.facebook.com/business/ads#overview

Muehling, D. D., & McCann, M. (1993). Attitude toward the ad: A review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15, 25-58.

Native Advertising Institute (2020). The Ultimate Native ads guide. Retrieved October 21, 2022, from https://blog.nativeadvertisinginstitute.com/native-advertising-ultimate-guide

Nenkov, G.Y. (2012). It’s all in the mindset: Effects of varying psychological distance in persuasive messages. Marketing Letters, 23, 615-628.

Ryoo, Y., Hyun, N. K. & Sung, Y. (2017). The effect of descriptive norms and construal level on consumers’ sustainable behaviors. Journal of Advertising, 46(4), 536-549.

Schivinski, B. & Dabrowski, D. (2015). The impact of brand communication on brand equity through Facebook. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 9(1), 31-53.

Sedikides, C. & Jackson, J. M. (1990). Social Impact Theory: A field test of source strength, source immediacy and number of targets. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(3), 273-281.

Septianto, F., & Pratiwi, L. (2016). The moderating role of construal level on the evaluation of emotional appeal vs. cognitive appeal advertisements. Marketing Letters, 27(1), 171-181.

Shin, S., Chung, N., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2019). Assessing the impact of textual content concreteness on helpfulness in online travel reviews. Journal of Travel Research, 58, 579-593.

Sramek, E. (2023). Native Advertising Best Practices (2024 Update): Programmatic Advertising. Retrieved July 09, 2024, from: https://www.scaleo.io

Statista (2024). Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2024, ranked by number of monthly active users. Retrieved July, 09. 2024, from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (2), 268-280.

Stritch, J., Pedersen, M. J., & Taggart, G. (2017). The Opportunities and Limitations of Using Mechanical Turk (Mturk) in Public Administration and Management Scholarship. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 489-511.

Theodorakis, I., & Painesis, G. (2018). The impact of psychological distance and construal level on consumers’ responses to taboos in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 47(2), 161-181.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2012). Construal level theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (p. 118-134). Sage Publications Ltd.

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.

Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, rrediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.

Vasquez, C. (2015). Right now versus back then: Recency and remoteness as discursive resources in online reviews. Discourse, Context & Media, 9, 5-13.

Wang, J-C. & Chang, C-H. (2013). How online social ties and product-related risks influence purchase intentions: A Facebook experiment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(5), 337-346.

Wang, S., & Lehto, X. (2020). The Interplay of Travelers’ Psychological Distance, Language Abstraction, and Message Appeal Type in Social Media Advertising. Journal of Travel Research, 59(8), 1430-1446.

Xue, F., & Zhou, L. (2022). Understanding social influence in Facebook fundraising: Relationship strength, immediacy of needs, and number of donations. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 28(4).

Xue, F. & Zhou, L. (2019). Social information in Facebook News Feed ads: Effects of personal relevance and brand familiarity. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(4), 570-588.

Yang, C. & Hu, J. (2024). Seize the time! How perceived busyness influences tourists’ preferences for destination advertising messages. Journal of Travel Research, 63(3), 588-605.

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-70.

Zhao, M., & Xie, J. (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers’ responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486-496.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Fei Xue, Lijie Zhou

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media

ISSN: 2182-9306

DOI: 10.54663/2182-9306

Qualis Periódicos - CAPES: B2

REBIB: Q2


Indexing:

Web of Science - Emerging Sources Citation Index - Clarivate Analytics

Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2021, 2022, 2023

Crossref

QUALIS CAPESGOOGLE SCHOLAR - LATINDEX - REDIB - RCAAP - OAJI - DRJI - MIAR - LIVRE - ERIH PLUS - INDEX COPERNICUS -